Parallel Dimension’s evidence revisited.
Posted by Augustine Towonsing on April 21, 2011 · 3 Comments
After 8 years finally at the moment of 21st April 2011 the parallel dimension’s evidence has once again revisited. Back in 2005, when the researcher of Malaysian Ghost Research for the first time views the evidence of the parallel dimension’s photo immediately he was doubt if that the photo is valid to be paranormal or not. In fact, the researcher has taken more than 3 months to figure out wither the photo is valid to be the evidence of the parallel dimension. Furthermore, the said photo also has been sent to the International Ghost Hunters Society for clarifications and they confirmed that it is due to camera slow shutter that produces a long exposed.
A paranormal photo captured from a public park in Sungai Petani back in 2005.
Those anomalies are smaller compared to those of surrounding people...
Interestingly at the same time the researcher had received an email that stressed out the same accusation that the photo is nothing than just a stack of crap photos that mistaken to be the paranormal evidence but at the same time has pin point that “this photo is due to slow shutter camera which at least in 2 seconds enabled the man walked as far as 5 to 6 feet.” Furthermore, after 7 years when the researcher republished the same evidence the researcher did not realize that the same question will reincarnate as “very compelling pictures, but can you rule out mechanical failure or something physical causing the anomalies? “. Yet indeed, we need a very critical person that can come up with a very good question to help us to shade off the hidden truth and the researcher is very grateful for such critical question that can lead us to the find out the truth.
Therefore, when we talk about this particular parallel dimension’s evidence at a glance we definitely say that this photo is due to a camera’s flaws. Indeed, truly it was a long exposed photo and to speak the truth, the researcher him self was confused wither this is valid to a paranormal evidence at first or not because during the investigation the researcher saw those ‘anomalies’ to be just like an ordinary person that the group was an adult teenager lead by a pretty young lady in red gown that performing a dragon dance. Imagine! During the photo was being captured we personally saw those anomaly and when it printed on photo it turn out to be something else.
We only has one physical body therefore we cannot produce more than one strike.
The height of the pond fence was 39 inches that explains the anomalies is smaller than the surrounding people.
Hence, if not because of the critical question definitely for a long time the said photo has been disregarded as stack of camera’s flaws. So, where are the facts that rules out the mechanical failure or something physical causing the anomalies? Therefore here are those facts that rules out our doubt; the ‘paranormal images’ are smaller than the surrounding people, if they were human person that performing a dragon dance yet they seems to be ignored by the surrounding people, we have only one physical body therefore we can’t produce more than one streak of smeared image, we need to understand the basic movements of human nature and the uneven distributions of the transparent image.
The photo is genuine and is not fake in any way...
PDF - Excited
- Fascinated
- Amused
- Bored
- Sad
- Angry
Comments
Related posts:
Hey there! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts! Keep up the fantastic work!
You made a few just right points there. I did a search on the subject and located most people will agree along with your blog.
I wish to point out my appreciation for your kindness giving support to those people who actually need help on in this concept. Your special dedication to getting the solution all around has been quite functional and has truly empowered guys just like me to achieve their targets. Your new helpful guide indicates this much to me and much more to my office workers. Thanks a lot; from each one of us.